Each individual has the option to rehearse sport without segregation.
All competitors partaking in the boxing competition of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 consent to the opposition's qualification and passage guidelines, as well as all pertinent clinical guidelines set by the Paris 2024 Boxing Unit (PBU) (if it's not too much trouble, track down all material principles here). Likewise with past Olympic boxing rivalries, the orientation and age of the competitors depend on their visa.
These principles likewise applied during the capability time frame, including the boxing competitions of the 2023 European Games, Asian Games, Container American Games and Pacific Games, the impromptu 2023 African qualifying competition in Dakar (SEN) and two world qualifying competitions held in Busto Arsizio (ITA) and Bangkok (THA) in 2024, which included a sum of 1,471 unique fighters from 172 Public Olympic Councils (NOCs), the Boxing Outcast Group and Individual Impartial Competitors, and highlighted north of 2,000 capability sessions.
The PBU utilized the Tokyo 2020 boxing rules as a gauge to foster its guidelines for Paris 2024. This was to limit the effect on competitors' arrangements and assurance consistency between Olympic Games. These Tokyo 2020 standards depended on the post-Rio 2016 principles, which were set up before the suspension of the boxing Global Organization by the IOC in 2019 and the ensuing withdrawal of its acknowledgment in 2023.
We have found in reports misdirecting data around two female competitors contending at the Olympic Games Paris 2024. The two competitors have been contending in global enclosing contests for a long time the ladies' classification, including the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, Global Boxing Affiliation (IBA) Big showdowns and IBA-endorsed competitions.
These two competitors were the survivors of an unexpected and inconsistent choice by the IBA. Towards the finish of the IBA Big showdowns in 2023, they were unexpectedly excluded with no fair treatment.
As indicated by the IBA minutes accessible on their site, this choice was at first taken exclusively by the IBA Secretary General and Chief. The IBA Board just sanctioned it a short time later and just thusly mentioned that a system to continue in comparative cases in the future be laid out and reflected in the IBA Guidelines. The minutes likewise say that the IBA ought to "lay out an unmistakable method on orientation testing".
The ongoing animosity against these two competitors depends completely on this erratic choice, which was taken with no legitimate strategy - particularly taking into account that these competitors had been contending in high level rivalry for a long time.
Such a methodology is in opposition to great administration.
Qualification rules ought not be changed during progressing rivalry, and any standard change should keep suitable cycles and ought to be founded on logical proof.
The IOC is focused on safeguarding the basic liberties of all competitors partaking in the Olympic Games according to the Olympic Sanction, the IOC Set of rules and the IOC Vital Structure on Common freedoms. The IOC is disheartened by the maltreatment that the two competitors are presently getting.
The IBA's acknowledgment was removed by the IOC in 2023 following its suspension in 2019. The withdrawal of acknowledgment was affirmed by the Court of Assertion for Game (CAS). See the IOC's assertion following the decision.
The IOC has clarified that it needs Public Boxing Organizations to arrive at an agreement around another Worldwide League for boxing to be remembered for the games program of the Olympic Games LA28.
No comments:
Post a Comment